JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barnacle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Barnacle, R.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 18:79-86 (2005)
© 2005 American Board of Family Practice

Depression Treatment in Primary Care

W. David Robinson, PhD, Jenenne A. Geske, PhD, Layne A. Prest, PhD and Rachel Barnacle, MS

From the Department of Family Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha

Correspondence: Address correspondence to W. David Robinson, PhD, Department of Family Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983075 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha NE 68198-3075 (e-mail wdrobins{at}unmc.edu)

Background: Depression costs the United States $40 billion annually. Primary care physicians play a key role in the identification and treatment of depression. This study focused on the treatment options recommended by physicians and whether physicians were following the recommended treatment guidelines.

Methods: We recorded treatment recommendations by examining charts for all patients with newly detected depression. The patients were from 44 family medicine practitioners and 23 general internal medicine practitioners in a Midwest university medical center setting.

Results: For both medical specialties combined, pharmacotherapy was the most widely used intervention (recommended for 52% of patients), whereas psychotherapy alone was the least frequently used intervention (recommended for 4% of patients). Family medicine practitioners recommended combination treatment (pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy) more frequently than did general internal medicine practitioners (P = .022), and female physicians recommended combination treatment more frequently than did male physicians (P = .010).

Conclusions: Pharmacotherapy was found to be the most widely used treatment despite current evidence-based recommendations. Barriers to effective treatment plan are discussed. The implications for mental health interventions, combination therapy, and cost offset are also discussed. Further research exploring the negotiation process during the patient-provider encounter would shed light on patient and physician factors influencing treatment decisions.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
W. D. Robinson, J. A. Geske, and L. A. Prest

J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2005; 18(5): 445 - 445.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
C. M. Ross
Fish Oil versus Cod Liver Oil: Is Vitamin D a Reason to Go Back to the Future
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2005; 18(5): 445 - 446.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Board of Family Medicine.