JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, T. K.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 18:48-56 (2005)
© 2005 American Board of Family Practice

Special Communication

Community Service by North Carolina Family Physicians

Adam O. Goldstein, MD, MPH, Diane Calleson, PhD, Peter Curtis, MD, Brian Hemphill, MD, MPH, George Gamble, PhD, Beat Steiner, MD, MPH and Thomas K. Moore, MD

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (AOG, DC, PC, BH, GG, BS)
Department of Family Medicine, Naval Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida (TKM)

Correspondence: Address correspondence to: Adam O. Goldstein, MD, Department of Family Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, CB 7595 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7595 (e-mail: aog{at}med.unc.edu)

Abstract

Background: Community service is an integral part of American society. Although Family Medicine advocates community service through community medicine, few data exist on family physicians’ involvement in voluntary community service activities or roles as community advocates.

Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 489 North Carolina family physicians, including a 20% random sample of those in community practice and all statewide faculty physicians. The survey assessed types and amount of volunteer activity, attitudes toward volunteer work, and factors that support or inhibit participation in community service.

Results: The overall response rate was 54%. Most respondents reported strong interests in community service before medical school and residency, yet few reported any relevant training during medical education. More than 85% of faculty and community practice family physicians reported participating in volunteer service in the previous year (70.8 mean hours for faculty vs 45.5 mean hours for community practice; P = .06). Family physicians also reported a wide variety of lifetime volunteer activities (mean number of different faculty physician activities 20.8 vs mean number of different community practice physician activities 16.7, P = .00). Less than 50% of both physician groups reported that their practice or program publicly supports those performing community service.

Conclusions: The great majority of family physicians in North Carolina regularly participate in one or more volunteer community service activities, frequently without organizational recognition. Data about the scope of service expected by communities and provided by physicians may assist the discipline in clarifying the place of volunteer community service in medical education, promotion guidelines and practice.






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Board of Family Medicine.