JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Rapid Responses: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rives, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Douglass, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rives, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Douglass, A. B.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 17:S23-S31 (2004)
© 2004 American Board of Family Practice


Article

Evaluation and Treatment of Low Back Pain in Family Practice

Peter A. Rives, MD and Alan B. Douglass, MD

Pain Care Institute, Owensboro, KY (PAR)
Family Practice Residency Program, Middlesex Hospital, Middletown, CT (ABD)

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Peter A. Rives, MD, FAAFP, 2350 Heartland Park, Owensboro, KY 42303 (e-mail: prives{at}adelphia.net)

Almost all working adults, more than half in any given year, experience low back pain. Although the differential diagnosis is extensive, most symptoms have biomechanical causes and resolve promptly with little intervention, although recurrence is common. History and physical examination are important in distinguishing potential causes and identifying "red flags" for more serious conditions. Diagnostic imaging should be ordered only when necessary because of the high incidence of radiologic abnormalities in asymptomatic persons. Once serious illness is ruled unlikely, first-line drug therapy with acetaminophen, a cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug is recommended. Short-term use of muscle relaxants may be considered, but they can be sedating. Patients should stay as active as possible. Comorbid conditions such as sleep disorders, anxiety, or depression should be treated, and psychosocial issues should be addressed. Opioids should be prescribed if other treatments have been insufficiently effective and if there is evidence of improved function with opioid treatment that outweighs adverse effects. Adjuvant antidepressants and anticonvulsants should be considered, especially in chronic or neuropathic pain. If a structural defect is identified and a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure is available, consider referral. If symptoms have not improved within 4 to 6 weeks, re-evaluation and additional diagnostic workup should be considered.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. D. Jones
Repeating Failed Policies Will Not Improve Outcomes
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2005; 18(2): 151 - 152.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Repeating failed policies will not improve outcomes
Jason D. Jones
JABFM Online, 11 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Reply to: Repeating failed policies will not improve outcomes, Jason D. Jones DC (11 January 2005)
Peter Rives MD, et al.
JABFM Online, 27 Jan 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Board of Family Medicine.