JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolfe, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R. M.
The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 17:150-157 (2004)
© 2004 American Board of Family Practice


Special Communication

Family Physicians’ Opinions and Attitudes to Three Clinical Practice Guidelines

Robert M. Wolfe, MD, Lisa K. Sharp, PhD and Ralph M. Wang

From the Department of Family Medicine, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Robert M. Wolfe, MD, Department of Family Medicine, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N. Lake Shore Drive, Room 1417, Chicago, IL 60611-3078

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been promoted as a strategy to measure and improve the quality of patient care. However, more effort has been expended on creating guidelines than implementing them. We surveyed family physicians about their knowledge of and attitudes toward 3 well-publicized CPGs.

Methods: A survey questionnaire was sent to a national sample of 600 family physicians selected at random from a file from the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP).

Results: After 2 mailings, the response rate was 71%. For each of the 3 guidelines, roughly 60% of respondents were familiar or somewhat familiar with the CPG. More than half of family physicians studied said they have changed their medical practices based on CPGs, and only 3% said they do not believe in guidelines and would not use them. Use of CPGs was lowest among physicians in solo practice and among those working in rural areas. However, no significant differences in CPG use or familiarity were noted based on number of years in practice. Many respondents indicated an interest in keeping CPGs current via the internet.

Conclusions: Most American family physicians find CPGs to be helpful, and familiarity with them is fairly uniform across most subgroups studied.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
Correction
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2005; 18(2): 153 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. M. Wolfe and L. K. Sharp
Compliance with Clinical Guidelines and the 'Law of Thirds'
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2004; 17(6): 475 - 475.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. Lember and A. Ratsep
The Impact of Clinical Practice Guidelines Should Not Be Overestimated
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2004; 17(6): 474 - 475.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Board of Family Medicine.