JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starfield, B.
Right arrow Articles by von Schrader, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Starfield, B.
Right arrow Articles by von Schrader, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 15, Issue 6 473-480, Copyright © 2002 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Variability in physician referral decisions

B. Starfield, C. B. Forrest, P. A. Nutting and S. von Schrader
School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

BACKGROUND: Because it is possible that part of the variability in frequency of interventions and even in outcomes results from the variability in referral patterns of primary care physicians, our objectives were to examine primary care physician decision making about referrals for several common adult and childhood conditions. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six family physicians in 80 office-based practices recorded reasons for referral to the most common types of specialists and the expectation of the specialist for conditions with at least seven referrals to each specialist. RESULTS: By far the most referrals were expected to be short-term (< 12 months); for more than 50%, the referrals were for consultation only (rather than direct intervention). For most of the 10 types of conditions, there were no apparent differences in reason for or expectation of the referral that would explain the choice of different types of specialists for referral. Expectations for shared care were generally more common in referrals to nonphysicians than to physicians. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed unexplained variability among family physicians in the specialists to whom patients are referred for specific conditions. Why some patients with the same condition are referred to surgeons and others to medical specialists is unclear, at least in the context of expectations for referral as being long-term vs short-term or consultative vs referral for definitive management. The impact of this variability on costs and outcome could be considerable and deserves more intensive study.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
B. Starfield, K. W. Lemke, R. Herbert, W. D. Pavlovich, and G. Anderson
Comorbidity and the Use of Primary Care and Specialist Care in the Elderly
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 215 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B. Starfield
Why is the grass greener?
BMJ, March 26, 2005; 330(7493): 727 - 729.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Hafeez, R. Riaz, S. U. Shah, J. Pervaiz, and D. Southall
Integrating health care for mothers and children in refugee camps and at district level
BMJ, April 3, 2004; 328(7443): 834 - 836.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Board of Family Medicine.