JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lesikar, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Keyl, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lesikar, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Keyl, P. M.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 15, Issue 1 11-19, Copyright © 2002 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Prospective study of brief neuropsychological measures to assess crash risk in older primary care patients

S. E. Lesikar, J. J. Gallo, G. W. Rebok and P. M. Keyl
Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

BACKGROUND: Practicing primary care physicians often encounter the difficult clinical situation of evaluating the older driver. We wanted to investigate the relation between self-reported driving behavior, neuropsychological measures, and crash risk to inform the development of a test battery that could predict unsafe driving behavior and was feasible for use by primary care physicians. METHODS: This study was a prospective follow-up of 107 drivers aged 65 years and older recruited from a primary care setting in 1995. Tests of attention, visual information processing, spatial orientation, and general mental status were administered at baseline. At baseline and after 2 years of follow-up, patients were asked about their driving history using the driving questionnaire. Risk for reported crashes in the follow-up period was assessed in relation to baseline driving history and measures of cognition. RESULTS: Baseline self-reports of driving habits and attitudes were associated with an increased risk of reporting a crash after 2 years of follow-up (relative risk ratio = 5.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63, 44.63). In addition, baseline tests of attention, visual information processing, and spatial orientation were associated with an increased risk of reporting motor vehicle crash at follow-up. For example, respondents with poor performance on the Trail Making Test-part A, were almost four times more likely to report a crash at follow-up (risk ratio = 3.15; 95% CI, 0.76, 13.07). CONCLUSION: Although our conclusions are tempered by small sample size, this preliminary study suggests that brief cognitive tests and simple questions about driving habits warrant further investigation as indicators of crash risk with potential utility for assessing older drivers in primary care.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
L. B. Brown and B. R. Ott
Driving and Dementia: A Review of the Literature
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, December 1, 2004; 17(4): 232 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
H. R. Bogner, J. B. Straton, J. J. Gallo, G. W. Rebok, and P. M. Keyl
The Role of Physicians in Assessing Older Drivers: Barriers, Opportunities, and Strategies
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2004; 17(1): 38 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
E. D. Richardson and R. A. Marottoli
Visual Attention and Driving Behaviors Among Community-Living Older Persons
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2003; 58(9): M832 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Board of Family Medicine.