JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boss, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Timbrook, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boss, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Timbrook, R. E.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 14, Issue 6 418-423, Copyright © 2001 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Clinical obstetric outcomes related to continuity in prenatal care

D. J. Boss and R. E. Timbrook
Family Practice Residency, Fort Wayne Medical Education Program, IN 46805, USA.

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care has long been considered a benefit to patients of family physicians, but quantifying these benefits has been problematic. Previous studies focused on patient preferences and relationship issues, whereas evidence regarding clinical endpoints has been lacking. This study reports differences in obstetric and neonatal outcomes related to continuity in prenatal care. METHODS: Using an historical prospective design, data were collected on 494 maternal-fetal dyads in two groups. One (named GAP, n = 40) received a high degree of continuity in their prenatal care, and one (named NHC, n = 454) received relatively little. Analyses were performed to determine not only the outcome differences between the groups, but also to what factor(s) these differences were attributable. RESULTS: The continuity in prenatal care group had better outcomes in neonatal morbidity, birth weight, maternal weight gain, and both Apgar scores. None of these differences was directly attributable to continuity. Rather, continuity in prenatal care was associated with the observed increase in the number of prenatal visits, which in turn was shown to be a significant factor in the greater birth weights and maternal weight gain. None of the factors examined appears to explain the difference in neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Women who receive prenatal care from a single physician are likely to receive more prenatal care, which is correlated with greater maternal weight gains and greater fetal birth weights.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. Ciceklioglu, M. T. Soyer, and Z. A. Ocek
Factors associated with the utilization and content of prenatal care in a western urban district of Turkey
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 533 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
J. W. Saultz
Defining and Measuring Interpersonal Continuity of Care
Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2003; 1(3): 134 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Board of Family Medicine.