JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hashim, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fiscella, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hashim, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fiscella, K.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 14, Issue 3 193-196, Copyright © 2001 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Effectiveness of telephone reminders in improving rate of appointments kept at an outpatient clinic: a randomized controlled trial

M. J. Hashim, P. Franks and K. Fiscella
Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, NY, USA.

BACKGROUND: Clinic appointments in which patients do not appear (no-show) result in loss of provider time and revenue. Previous studies have shown variable effectiveness in telephone and mailed reminders to patients. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of telephone reminders 1 day before the scheduled appointments in an urban family practice residency clinic. Patients with appointments were randomized to be telephoned 1 day before the scheduled visit; 479 patients were telephoned and 424 patients were not telephoned. RESULTS: The proportions of patients not showing up for their appointments were 19% in the telephoned and 26% in the not-telephoned groups (P = .0065). Significantly more cancelations were made when telephoning patients before their visit, 17% compared with 9.9%. The opened scheduling slots were used for appointments for other patients. This additional revenue offset the cost of telephone intervention in our cost analysis. CONCLUSION: Reminding patients by telephone calls 1 day before their appointments yields increased cancelations that can be used to schedule other patients. Telephone reminders provide substantial net revenue, but the results may be population specific.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
C. E. Guse, L. Richardson, M. Carle, and K. Schmidt
The Effect of Exit-Interview Patient Education on No-Show Rates at a Family Practice Residency Clinic
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2003; 16(5): 399 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Board of Family Medicine.