JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Longlett, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wesley, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Longlett, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wesley, R. M.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 14, Issue 1 54-63, Copyright © 2001 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Community-oriented primary care: historical perspective

S. K. Longlett, J. E. Kruse and R. M. Wesley
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Quincy Family Practice Center, 62301, USA.

BACKGROUND: Community-oriented primary care (COPC) is a systematic approach to health care based upon principles derived from epidemiology, primary care, preventive medicine, and health promotion. We describe the development of COPC from an historical perspective. A critical assessment of current trends and implication for physician education and practice of COPC will be discussed in a companion article in the next issue of The Journal. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched using the key phrase "community-oriented primary care" Other sources of information included books and other documents. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In the 1950s, Sydney Kark showed dramatic positive changes in the health status of the population of Pholela, South Africa, using this approach. Similar approaches showed positive change in the health status of poor and underserved populations in the United States. The results were so impressive that the Institute of Medicine recommended widespread application of COPC in the United States. Successful COPC practices, however, have historically required considerable external funding from private and government sources. Thus, controversy about the feasibility of implementation of COPC in mainstream primary care practices developed. Schools of medicine and the discipline of family medicine have struggled to implement effective training in COPC within traditional medical school and residency structures. Yet, the societal need for recognition of and intervention in community health problems and coordination of community health resources continues.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Goldhagen
Integrating Pediatrics and Public Health
Pediatrics, April 1, 2005; 115(4/S1): 1202 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
D. Campos-Outcalt
Public Health and Family Medicine: An Opportunity
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2004; 17(3): 207 - 211.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
M. Plescia and M. Groblewski
A Community-Oriented Primary Care Demonstration Project: Refining Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes
Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2004; 2(2): 103 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
F. Mullan and L. Epstein
Community-Oriented Primary Care: New Relevance in a Changing World
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2002; 92(11): 1748 - 1755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Board of Family Medicine.