JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knishkowy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baras, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knishkowy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Baras, M.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 13, Issue 1 11-16, Copyright © 2000 by American Board of Family Practice

ARTICLES

Adolescent preventive health visits: a comparison of two invitation protocols

B. Knishkowy, H. Palti, M. Schein, J. Yaphe, R. Edman and M. Baras
Family Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and the Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine of the Hebrew University and Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent health care in family practice at times creates conflicting responsibilities for parents and their teenagers. In the context of a new adolescent preventive health program in a family practice setting, we compared attendance rates using two invitation protocols, the protocols differing in their emphasis on adolescent autonomy vs parental responsibility. METHODS: One hundred six teenagers in the seventh and tenth grades were invited for preventive health visits with the family nurse and physician using two protocols. Protocol 1 involved obtaining parental consent before approaching the adolescent. With protocol 2, an invitation letter and parental consent form were mailed to the teenager, while a letter of explanation was sent concurrently to the parents. In each case, the letter of invitation was followed up by a telephone call for those who did not respond. The spontaneous response rate (a positive response after receiving the letter), agreement to attend rate (a positive response after receiving the letter or being telephoned), and the attendance rate were determined according to grade, sex, and protocol. RESULTS: The spontaneous response rate was 21%, the agreement to attend rate was 75%, and the attendance rate was 44%. Attendance rates were higher for the girls compared with the boys (54% vs 35%, P = .08) and for the seventh graders compared with the tenth graders (53% vs 31%, P = .03). The spontaneous response rate was lower among the tenth graders using protocol 2 (8% vs 37.5% with protocol 1, P = .04), while the agreement to attend rate and attendance rate did not differ for the two protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one half of this population of adolescents attended preventive health visits at the family nurse's and physician's initiative. A follow-up telephone call after the initial written invitation resulted in increased participation, while approaching the teenager or parent initially did not make a difference in attendance. This pilot study shows the potential for initiating an adolescent health program in the family practice setting.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
I. Jhanjee, D. Saxeena, J. Arora, and D. K. Gjerdingen
Parents' Health and Demographic Characteristics Predict Noncompliance with Well-Child Visits
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2004; 17(5): 324 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Board of Family Medicine.