JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by MacDonald, D. C.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 12, Issue 3 214-218, Copyright © 1999 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Appropriate roles of cardiac troponins in evaluating patients with chest pain

M. S. Rice and D. C. MacDonald
Department of Family Practice, Madigan Army Medical Center, Fort Lewis, Wash., USA.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction relies upon the clinical history, interpretation of the electrocardiogram, and measurement of serum levels of cardiac enzymes. Newer biochemical markers of myocardial injury, such as cardiac troponin I and cardiac troponin T, are now being used instead of or along with the standard markers, the MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) and lactate dehydrogenase. METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE literature search (1987 to 1997) using the key words "troponin I," "troponin T," and "acute myocardial infarction." We reviewed selected articles related to the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of these cardiac markers in evaluating patients with suspected myocardial infarction. RESULTS: We found that (1) troponin I is a better cardiac marker than CK-MB for myocardial infarction because it is equally sensitive yet more specific for myocardial injury; (2) troponin T is a relatively poorer cardiac marker than CK-MB because it is less sensitive and less specific for myocardial injury; and (3) both troponin I and troponin T may be used as independent prognosticators of future cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Troponin I is a sensitive and specific marker for myocardial injury and can be used to predict the likelihood of future cardiac events. It is not much more expensive to measure than CK-MB. Overall, troponin I is a better cardiac marker than CK-MB and should become the preferred cardiac enzyme when evaluating patients with suspected myocardial infarction.





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Board of Family Medicine.