JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nease, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cass, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nease, D. E., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Cass, A. R.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 12, Issue 1 21-31, Copyright © 1999 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Investigation of a severity-based classification of mood and anxiety symptoms in primary care patients

D. E. Nease Jr, R. J. Volk and A. R. Cass
Department of Family Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, USA.

BACKGROUND: Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) classifications describe spectrums of symptoms that define mood and anxiety disorders. These DSM classifications have been applied to primary care populations to establish the frequency of these disorders in primary care. DSM classifications, however, might not adequately describe the underlying or natural groupings of mood and anxiety symptoms in primary care. This study explores common clusters of mood and anxiety symptoms and their severity while exploring the degree of cluster congruency with current DSM classification schemes. We also evaluate how well the groupings derived from these different classifying methods explain differences in patients' health-related quality of life. METHODS: Study design was cross-sectional, using a sample of 1333 adult primary care patients attending a university-based family medicine clinic. We applied cluster analysis to responses on a 15-item instrument measuring symptoms of mood and anxiety and their severity. We used the PRIME-MD to determine the presence of DSM-III-R disorders. The SF-36 Health Survey was used to assess health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Cluster analysis produced four groups of patients different from groupings based on the DSM. These four groups differed from each other on sociodemographic indicators, health-related quality of life, and frequency of DSM disorders. Cluster membership was associated in three of four clusters with a clinically significant and progressive decrease in mental and physical health functioning as measured by the SF-36 Health Survey. This decline was independent of the presence of a DSM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care classification scheme for mood and anxiety symptoms that includes severity appears to provide more useful information than traditional DSM classifications of disorders.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
D. E Nease Jr and J. E Aikens
DSM depression and anxiety criteria and severity of symptoms in primary care: cross sectional study
BMJ, November 1, 2003; 327(7422): 1030 - 1031.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. L. Spitzer, K. Kroenke, J. B. W. Williams, and and the Patient Health Questionnaire Primary Care
Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ Primary Care Study
JAMA, November 10, 1999; 282(18): 1737 - 1744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Board of Family Medicine.