JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frame, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Eberly, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frame, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Eberly, S. W.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 11, Issue 5 341-346, Copyright © 1998 by American Board of Family Practice


ARTICLES

Use of colchicine to treat severe constipation in developmentally disabled patients

P. S. Frame, P. Dolan, R. Kohli and S. W. Eberly
Tri-County Family Medicine, Cohocton, NY 14826, USA.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe developmental disabilities often have concurrent decreased neuromuscular tone of the gastrointestinal tract, which can lead to a weak gag reflex, esophageal reflux, aspiration, and severe intractable constipation. High doses of multiple laxatives are frequently needed to maintain bowel motility in these patients. Colchicine, a natural alkaloid that is primarily used for the treatment of acute attacks of gout, causes an increase in gastrointestinal motility by neurogenic stimulation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether daily colchicine administration can improve bowel function and reduce laxative use in profoundly disabled patients with severe, intractable constipation who currently require large doses of multiple laxatives. METHODS: Twelve developmentally disabled patients who required three or more different laxatives to manage their chronic constipation were selected to participate in a double-blind, crossover study. Eleven patients who completed the study received placebo treatment for 8 weeks and colchicine treatment for 8 weeks. The total number of bowel movements and the total number of laxatives used during each of the two 8-week periods were compared. RESULTS: Eight of 11 patients experienced an improved bowel pattern while on colchicine compared with placebo, as defined by an increase in total number of bowel movements or a decrease in total number of rectal laxatives used. No clinically important complications were related to use of colchicine. CONCLUSIONS: Colchicine appears to be a valuable adjunct in the management of severe intractable constipation. Larger, long-term studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results.





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Board of Family Medicine.