JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drivdahl, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Miser, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drivdahl, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Miser, W. F.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 11, Issue 3 193-199, Copyright © 1998 by American Board of Family Practice

ARTICLES

The use of alternative health care by a family practice population

C. E. Drivdahl and W. F. Miser
Department of Family Practice, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash, USA.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the characteristics of family practice patients using alternative medicine, the problems that led them to use it, and their satisfaction with its use. METHODS: A confidential questionnaire was mailed to 250 randomly selected adults enrolled in a large military family practice clinic, with a final response rate of 71 percent. RESULTS: More than 28 percent of patients used some form of alternative medicine. The typical user was 30 to 49 years old, female, white, and well educated. Common methods used were chiropractic (64 percent), massage therapy (36 percent), herbal therapy (32 percent), and acupuncture (16 percent). The most common problems for which patients sought alternative care were back pain (56 percent), other musculoskeletal pain (22 percent), and stress or other psychosocial problems (20 percent). Fewer than one half were satisfied with their alternative health care, although 82 percent reported at least some improvement in their conditions. Most (63 percent) had not told their family physician of their use of alternative health care. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of family practice patients are using alternative medicine. Although most derive some benefit, most are not satisfied with the results. Reasons for this disparity between satisfaction and effectiveness of alternative medicine deserve further study.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
J. I. Gold, C. D. Nicolaou, K. A. Belmont, A. R. Katz, D. M. Benaron, and W. Yu
Pediatric Acupuncture: A Review of Clinical Research
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., January 10, 2008; (2008) nem181v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. K. Burge and T. L. Albright
Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Family Practice Patients in South Texas
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2002; 92(10): 1614 - 1616.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
C. M. Baldwin, K. Long, K. Kroesen, A. J. Brooks, and I. R. Bell
A Profile of Military Veterans in the Southwestern United States Who Use Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Implications for Integrated Care
Arch Intern Med, August 12, 2002; 162(15): 1697 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
K. J. Kemper, R. Sarah, L. MPH, E. Silver-Highfield, L.{s. E. Xiarhos, L. Barnes, and C. Berde
On Pins and Needles? Pediatric Pain Patients' Experience With Acupuncture
Pediatrics, April 1, 2000; 105(4): 941 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Board of Family Medicine.