The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 11, Issue 2 96-104, Copyright © 1998 by American Board of Family Practice

ARTICLES

Computerized prompts for cancer screening in a community health center

K. S. Yarnall, B. K. Rimer, D. Hynes, G. Watson, P. R. Lyna, C. T. Woods-Powell, J. Terrenoire and L. T. Barber
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

BACKGROUND: We describe the implementation and subsequent use of a computerized health maintenance tracking system in a large, urban, North Carolina community health center (Lincoln Community Health Center) as part of a larger study designed to increase rates of mammography, Papanicolaou tests, and smoking cessation in low-income African-Americans. METHODS: Clinicians from the Lincoln Community Health Center were involved in the design and implementation of the computer system. At each office visit, clinicians received a computerized encounter form indicating needed screening tests, counseling, and immunizations for each randomly selected study patient (n = 1318). RESULTS: Initial clinician compliance rates with filling out the form were 95 percent (mammography), 82 percent (Papanicolaou test), 77 percent (clinician breast examination), and 55 percent (smoking cessation). Cumulative compliance leveled off at 21 months to 65 percent, 57 percent, 53 percent, and 38 percent, respectively, despite multiple reminder strategies. When surveyed, most clinicians thought it was a good reminder system but said they did not always complete the form because of time demands. Costs of adapting and implementing the system were $23,332.08 ($17.70 per study). Per-patient costs would have been reduced further if more patients had been included in the project. CONCLUSIONS: State-of-the-art computer prompting systems can be useful in a community health center; however, even with prompting, clinicians still only addressed health maintenance with their patients about 50 percent of the time. Additional interventions will be needed, particularly in low-income populations, to meet the Healthy People 2000 goals in health promotion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Jimbo, D. E. Nease Jr, M. T. Ruffin IV, and G. K. Rana Information Technology and Cancer Prevention CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2006; 56(1): 26 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Johnson, J. R. Serwint, L. M. Fagan, R. E. Thompson, and M. H. Wilson Computer-Based Documentation: Effect on Parent and Physician Satisfaction During a Pediatric Health Maintenance Encounter Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2005; 159(3): 250 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Zapka, S. H. Taplin, L. I. Solberg, and M. M. Manos A Framework for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: The Case of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 4 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]