JABFM
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Block, B.
Right arrow Articles by Branham, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Block, B.
Right arrow Articles by Branham, R. A.

The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, Vol 11, Issue 1 1-11, Copyright © 1998 by American Board of Family Practice

ARTICLES

Efforts to improve the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results

B. Block and R. A. Branham
Primary Care Institute, Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

BACKGROUND: We describe and evaluate efforts to improve the follow-up care of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results at an academic family practice center at Shadyside Hospital in Pittsburgh. METHODS: From 1994 to 1996, 1796 patients received Papanicolaou testing; 147 (8 percent) of the smears had abnormal findings--16 percent had atypia, 83 percent had dysplasia, and 1 percent had carcinoma in situ. Patients received follow-up care based on a formalized protocol using educational input, logistic aids, and automated prompting. RESULTS: Overall follow-up success rates and colposcopy completion rates increased dramatically. Whereas 36 percent of patients with abnormal findings on Papanicolaou smears had been overdue for follow-up in 1990, only 13 percent were overdue in 1996 after our interventions. Patients assigned to Papanicolaou testing for follow-up of abnormal findings failed to receive a test in 9 of 45 (20 percent) cases, but those assigned to colposcopy follow-up failed to receive a test in only 10 of 102 (10 percent) of cases. Appointment failure rates at colposcopy clinic dropped from 56 percent in 1993 to 12 percent in 1996. Colposcopic biopsy was far superior to Papanicolaou test for detecting precursors of cervical cancer at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Educational programs, formalized approaches to care, transportation assistance, and reminder systems are not only practical but also can dramatically improve the outcome of cervical cancer screening programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Fam MedHome page
J. Melnikow, B. K. S. Chan, and G. K. Stewart
Do Follow-up Recommendations for Abnormal Papanicolaou Smears Influence Patient Adherence?
Arch Fam Med, November 1, 1999; 8(6): 510 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Board of Family Medicine.